评估的准确性生理性别和性别认同术语使用人体工程学研究:一个范围
描述
介绍人体工程学研究有时包含生理性别和性别身份来评估其影响工作场所健康和安全建议。目前,研究人员正在讨论如何最好的包括性和性别。然而,缺乏讨论是否正在使用这些术语准确时。因此,本研究的目的有三个层面:1)了解生理性别和性别认同目前用于人体工程学研究,2)来评估这个用的准确性,并为未来的研究提供建议。这项工作,我的目标是回答以下问题:“如何准确的人体工程学研究认为生理性别和性别身份的路吗?“我的方法进行了范围,研究人体工程学研究的回顾生理性别和性别身份。我评估性和性别方面是如何在研究如何准确使用。我检查数据库使用过滤结果,评价文章标题、阅读研究摘要,从完整的研究文章中提取相关信息。我记录性和性别术语的使用在每一个包含文章以识别趋势和评估的准确性。结果我范围检查的结果表明,人体工程学研究并不适用生理性别或性别认同正确的概念。具体来说,性和性别是经常也和他们的术语交替使用。 Also, gender was discussed more frequently than sex, although physical characteristics were discussed more than social ones. Discussion Although gender may not always be necessary to discuss in ergonomics research, sex-based differences are extremely important considerations. When communicating these sex-based differences, it is imperative that this is done accurately, in order to ensure that all readers, especially those affected by this research, are able to understand and apply its findings. The results of this analysis revealed that sex and gender terminology are almost always used incorrectly in ergonomics research. Ergonomics research failing to apply biological sex and gender identity correctly could lead to misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the subsequent recommendations. If sex and gender are conflated, findings could be interpreted as being relevant to one group although they were meant for another. Also, gender is not necessary to discuss in ergonomics research that aims to identify physical or biological traits. However, if social differences are discussed, all possible gender identities should be included so ergonomics can help the greatest number of people. Recommendations Ergonomics research should aim to be more accurate while discussing biological sex and gender identity. Sex and gender should be used properly, discussed separately, and gender should only be discussed in social contexts acknowledging all gender identities, rather than just men and women.
主题
人体工程学的研究,生理性别,性别身份,准确性